Ken Stewart

People-focused, business-minded, technology-savvy leader who likes to ask: "Why?"

  • kallan
    Kia ora e Ken

    When I left my position as Head of Science in a secondary school in the 80s, to take up a position teaching adults how to use computers, I relinquished about 10 weeks leave per year that I was entitled to as a teacher. I had only 15 days leave per year in the corporate environment that I began working in.

    After over a year working and enjoying my new job, my boss summoned me into her office and gave me a dressing down because she could not permit me to carry my accumulated leave over to the next year. I had worked for a whole year in the new job and not taken one day's leave (other than the statutory holidays which I had no choice over).

    This was salutary for me. As a school teacher, I needed at least a week's leave winding down at the end of every term before I could enjoy what was left of the rest of the leave periods.

    At Christmas, for instance, I would go on leave at around 15 Dec and take up to near Christmas day to come right. This, by the way, is a usual pattern for most school teachers.

    So you are right to ask about the need to recharge. The trouble is when the employee has no real control over how they organise their working week. For as much as I enjoyed my job as a Head of Department, I had no real control over the quantity of work and teaching that I had to deliver, no more than was the case for any of my colleagues at that time. Changing my job was the only answer. And it worked.

    Catchya later
  • Ken, you hit it perfectly... while you did not have any choice within the confines of your former employer, you did choose to free yourself from the environment. I certainly hope everyone has a much less dramatic choice to make - but my point ultimately is that we have it within our power to make choices. Sometimes we allow ourselves to be confined by the ramifications, which simply mistakes choice for responsibility. These two of course go hand in hand, but that is for another post, my friend!

    Regards,
    Ken
  • Michael_Josefowicz
    Ken,

    Thanks for another Nice post.

    Sorry for the little screed that follows, But this really does get under my skin and I think it speaks to the same point.

    I've thought for a long time that GDP is a dumb way to think about "how we're doing." What precisely is GDP? What does it really mean to say the "economy" is healthy? The way I see it, only people can really be healthy. What the heck is the "economy" anyway.

    Anyway, here's a tweet I found that points to another way to think about it. I'm not saying it's just right, but I thought you might find it interesting.

    @dcarliNational Accounts of Well-being http://bit.ly/XfGP
  • Thank you for the link, Michael.
blog comments powered by Disqus

RSSTwitter CF